Recruitment and Talent Acquisition

Gen Z in the Workplace: Zooming into a New Era

An image of the younger generation representing Gen Z in the workplace.

The workforce is experiencing a major shakeup as Generation Z (born 1997-2012) enters the job market, bringing fresh perspectives and expectations. For HR professionals, understanding and adapting to Gen Z in the workplace is crucial for attracting and retaining talent. Here are the top three insights from iHire’s 2024 Gen Z Workforce Survey: Decoding a New Generation of Job Seekers.

1. Gen Z’s Preferences and Values: The Human Touch Matters

Craving Connections: Despite growing up with screens, 55.8% of Gen Z prefers in-person work environments, with another 26.6% opting for hybrid work options. They value real human connections and face-to-face interactions more than you might think.
Positive Vibes Only: Gen Z is all about working in a non-toxic, supportive environment. A considerable 82.4% stressed the importance of a positive atmosphere, along with strong DE&I commitments and shared values. Forget the fancy brand names – it’s all about feeling good at work.
Flexibility Reigns Supreme: Flexibility is a must-have, with 81.3% of Gen Z candidates seeking employers who offer work-life balance through flexible schedules, four-day workweeks, and unlimited paid time off. They want to work smart, not just hard.

2. Busting Stereotypes: Gen Z’s Got Ambition and Drive

Dream Jobs Ahead: Despite some misconceptions, nearly 70% of Gen Zers have a dream job in mind and are committed to achieving it within the next decade. They’re not just job-hopping; they’re planning careers.
Soft Skills Spotlight: While employers noted gaps in areas like interviewing and communication, Gen Z is eager to learn. HR can be the bridge by providing training and resources to polish these essential skills.
Job Search Woes: Unrealistic job requirements and ghosting are major hurdles for Gen Z. HR professionals should aim for clear communication and realistic expectations to create a more supportive hiring process.

3. Winning Recruitment and Retention with Gen Z in the Workplace

Map Out Careers: Clear career advancement paths and professional development opportunities are key to retaining Gen Z employees. Offering stipends for certifications and online courses will satisfy their hunger for continuous learning.
Pay and Perks: Competitive compensation and attractive benefits are non-negotiable. Gen Z values health insurance, 401(k) options, mental health support, and transportation perks. It’s about the total package.
People-First Culture: Emphasizing a respectful, autonomous work environment where Gen Z employees feel valued and trusted will boost engagement and retention. They want to be more than just a number – they want to make an impact.

By embracing and adapting to the unique needs of Gen Z in the workplace, HR professionals can create a dynamic and inclusive workplace that harnesses the energy and potential of this new generation. Ready to ride the wave of change? Gen Z is here, and they’re ready to make a difference.

Read the full report here.

RTO Showdown: Legal Clashes and Employee Needs

Marisol Ciovacco

An image representing a legal battle due to RTO mandates.

Navigating the tumultuous seas of return-to-office (RTO) policies has become a defining challenge for HR professionals in today’s ever-evolving workplace. With employees fighting back against rigid mandates, companies striving to boost productivity, and the undeniable impact on our environment, the stakes have never been higher. How can HR leaders find the perfect balance between organizational goals and employee satisfaction?

The Legal Landscape and Employee Pushback

Employees are increasingly fighting back against rigid RTO mandates, sometimes taking their battles to court. One prominent example is Zacchery Belval, who was dismissed after refusing to return to the office due to congenital heart disease and severe anxiety. Even though Belval provided several doctor’s notices requesting accommodations to work from home, his employer denied his request and insisted on in-person attendance. Belval’s case highlights the pressing need for flexible work policies that accommodate health concerns.

For HR professionals, this underscores the importance of balancing company policies with legal and ethical considerations to ensure that employee rights are respected. The growing trend of employees taking legal action signifies a shift in how workers are willing to defend their right to flexible working conditions, especially when health and well-being are at stake.

The Business Case for RTO

Despite the resistance, many companies are moving forward with RTO plans. A survey by ResumeBuilder.com found that 90% of companies intend to return to the office by the end of 2024, with many tracking employee attendance. Companies cite improved revenue, productivity, and company culture as key motivations. However, HR leaders must weigh these benefits against potential employee dissatisfaction and turnover risks.

The Productivity Paradox

Interestingly, research from the Katz Graduate School of Business suggests that RTO mandates might not improve financial performance and could even harm employee satisfaction. This paradox highlights the importance of focusing on results rather than location. HR leaders should foster a supportive environment that enhances productivity and well-being, regardless of where employees work.

Cultural and Engagement Challenges

A poll of U.S. CEOs revealed that many companies are reverting to in-office work due to challenges in maintaining collaboration, culture, and innovation. However, hybrid models, though less common, often yield better employee satisfaction and engagement. HR professionals should explore hybrid solutions that offer flexibility while still addressing collaboration needs.

Impact on Leadership and Talent Retention

Return-to-office mandates also impact senior leaders and talent retention. Reports indicate that a significant number of executives are willing to quit over strict RTO policies, which could destabilize organizations. HR leaders must engage in open dialogues with all levels of staff to understand their needs and concerns, ensuring that policies are both top-down and bottom-up.

Environmental Considerations

The environmental cost of commuting is another critical factor. Remote work has been shown to reduce carbon emissions significantly, a benefit often overlooked in RTO discussions. For companies promoting sustainability programs, it is crucial to integrate these considerations into their RTO policies. Failure to do so can result in accusations of “greenwashing,” where a company appears to support environmental causes but does not implement effective practices. HR professionals should ensure that their environmental initiatives are genuine and comprehensive, supporting remote work options to reduce commuting emissions and aligning with broader corporate social responsibility goals.

Actionable Tips for HR Leaders

Adopt Flexible Work Arrangements: Embrace hybrid work models that balance in-person collaboration with remote work flexibility. This approach can cater to diverse employee needs and improve overall satisfaction.
Enhance Communication and Support: Foster open communication channels to address employee concerns. Provide mental health support and ensure managers are trained to handle sensitive issues effectively.
Leverage Technology: Utilize collaboration tools and project management software to maintain productivity and engagement, regardless of physical location.
Promote Sustainability: Integrate environmental considerations into your RTO policies. Encourage remote work options to reduce commuting emissions and support green initiatives. Ensure that these practices are genuine to avoid greenwashing accusations.
Focus on Results: Shift the focus from physical presence to outcomes. Develop clear performance metrics and reward employees based on their contributions rather than their location.

By adopting these strategies, HR professionals can navigate the complexities of return-to-office mandates, ensuring a balanced approach that supports both organizational goals and employee well-being. With the right mix of flexibility, support, and innovation, the future of work can be bright and inclusive.

Why RTO Mandates Could Be Your Biggest Mistake

Marisol Ciovacco

An employee experiencing critical stress levels due to RTO mandates.

In today’s dynamic work environment where return-to-office (RTO) mandates are on the rise, HR professionals are grappling with a crucial challenge: keeping top talent happy and engaged. The answer, as revealed by recent studies, lies in one word: flexibility. By embracing hybrid work arrangements, companies can significantly boost employee satisfaction and retention. Let’s dive into why flexibility is the key to success in the modern workplace.

The Perils of RTO Mandates

Imagine this: nearly three-quarters of executives see RTO mandates sparking leadership conflicts, according to a Gartner report. Despite 63% of HR leaders pushing for more office time, these mandates often backfire. Employees cite a lack of work-life balance as a top reason for quitting, and the rigid RTO approach leaves high performers, women, and millennials—the very people who value flexibility—feeling frustrated and undervalued. Instead of fostering loyalty, strict office requirements diminish employees’ intent to stay, lowering overall morale and productivity.

Flexibility: The Employee Dealbreaker

A study by Greenhouse Candidate Experience sheds light on a startling fact: 76% of employees would leave their jobs if flexible work options vanished. This sentiment is echoed in findings from Unispace, where 42% of companies with RTO mandates face unexpected retention and recruitment challenges. Even the Federal Reserve notes that taking away hybrid work feels like a pay cut to employees, driving them to seek more accommodating workplaces. It’s clear that flexibility isn’t just a perk—it’s a necessity.

Hybrid Work: Your Competitive Edge

The IWG report brings good news for those willing to adapt: hybrid work arrangements lead to happier, more loyal employees (Source 4). Imagine boosting productivity, wellness, and mental health across your team—sounds great, right? HR leaders are unanimous: hybrid work is the way forward, making it easier to attract and retain top talent. Companies that embrace this approach report improved engagement and stronger team dynamics.

Balancing Act: The Hybrid Approach

Studies from the University of Pittsburgh highlight a crucial insight: strict RTO policies often fail to boost financial performance or productivity. Instead, they alienate employees, creating a toxic work environment and driving talent away. On the other hand, hybrid work models offer a balanced solution. By blending in-person and remote work, companies can support employee well-being, reduce carbon footprints, and enhance work-life balance. It’s a win-win situation that promises long-term benefits.

Flexibility is the Future

HR professionals, the message is clear: flexibility and hybrid work arrangements are not just trends—they’re essential strategies for retaining talent and driving success. Mandating a rigid return to the office can lead to higher turnover, disengagement, and recruitment challenges. Instead, adopting a flexible, human-centric approach will improve employee satisfaction, boost productivity, and enhance retention. Embracing hybrid work is the key to thriving in the modern workplace. It’s time to future-proof your operations and stay ahead in the competitive talent market.

Understanding America’s Labor Shortage

Marisol Ciovacco

A newspaper advertises a job opening during a labor shortage.

The current labor shortage in the United States presents a complex challenge for businesses across industries. HR professionals must navigate this landscape to attract and retain talent effectively. Here are three main takeaways from recent research on America’s labor shortage:

1. Labor Force Participation Decline

Missing Workers: Workforce participation remains below pre-pandemic levels, with 1.7 million fewer Americans in the workforce compared to February 2020.
Job Openings vs. Unemployment: Despite 8.5 million job openings, only 6.5 million unemployed workers are available, leading to a significant gap.
Long-term Trends: The labor force participation rate has been declining for decades, from 67.2% in 2001 to 62.7% now. If participation rates were at pre-pandemic levels, there would be 2 million more workers.

2. Factors Contributing to the Shortage

Early Retirements and Aging Workforce: The pandemic accelerated early retirements, with over 3 million adults retiring early by October 2021. The aging population continues to shrink the workforce as younger generations have fewer children.
Lack of Access to Childcare: The pandemic exacerbated existing issues with access to affordable childcare. The childcare industry lost 370,600 jobs early in the pandemic and has not fully recovered, making it difficult for parents, especially mothers, to return to work.
Net International Migration: The contribution of international migration to the U.S. population has dropped significantly, further limiting the available workforce. In 2020-2021, net migration added only 247,000 people compared to over a million in previous years.

3. Shift in Workforce Dynamics

New Business Starts: Many workers have left traditional employment to start their own businesses, with 5.5 million new businesses launched in 2023.
Increased Savings and Economic Stability: Enhanced unemployment benefits and stimulus checks during the pandemic allowed many to save money, reducing the immediate need to return to work.
The Great Reshuffle: High quit rates are more accurately described as a “Great Reshuffle,” where workers are seeking better opportunities rather than exiting the workforce entirely.

Essential Strategies for HR Success

Understanding these dynamics is crucial for HR professionals. The labor shortage is driven by multiple factors, including demographic shifts, economic changes, and evolving worker preferences. To address these challenges, HR professionals must:

Innovate Recruitment Strategies: Adapt to the changing labor market by leveraging flexible work arrangements, competitive salaries, and robust benefits packages.
Support Workforce Participation: Implement policies that support working parents, such as flexible schedules and childcare assistance.
Foster Employee Retention: Create a positive work environment with opportunities for career growth and development to retain talent in a competitive market.

By understanding and addressing these underlying factors, HR professionals can better navigate the current labor shortage and build a resilient workforce for the future.

Recruiting Gen Z: Adapting Strategies to Overcome the Labor Shortage

Marisol Ciovacco

The Gen Z Factor

The post-pandemic world has shifted the working landscape like never before. Companies were pushed to adapt to the “new normal” by implementing remote/hybrid accommodations and increasing focus on employee wellness. Despite all the changes that companies have made in an attempt to stay afloat, the U.S. is still facing a major labor shortage. On the surface, Gen Z’s addition to the workforce should be a relief to recruiters. As Gen Z makes up 27% of the global workforce with an expectation to overtake baby boomers over the next year, these younger generations should count as a major improvement against the labor shortage. However, the process of recruiting Gen Z talent has proven more complicated than recruiters originally anticipated.

Modernizing Recruitment

Every generation has its preferences regarding how they want to be recruited, and Gen Z is no different. When attracting potential employees, recruiters must utilize an updated strategy, or risk facing the 54% of Gen Z applicants who will drop the application for being too outdated. Since 54% of Gen Z is on social media for at least four hours a day, recruiters who utilize the company’s social media platform are more likely to attract this market. With recent data revealing social media led to job offers for 73% of job seekers aged 18-34, this is a strategy that recruiters cannot ignore. Gen Z is a technologically advanced generation, and they want to see companies willing to adapt to the changing world. Alongside social media recruitment, they want to see other modernizations to the process such as virtual interviews, automatic chatting software, and optimization of mobile applications.

Streamlining the Application Process

Besides implementing a modern recruiting practice, the application process must be as streamlined as possible. In a survey from Bullhorn of 1,000 Gen Z job candidates in the U.S., three out of four respondents admitted to abandoning a promising work opportunity due to obstacles in the process. One-third of respondents abandoned their applications before they were even submitted, citing the fact that the process was too time-consuming. Some recruiters might prefer requiring lengthy applications to ensure they will gather enough data for the screening process, but the opposite is usually true. Too much information makes the screening process even lengthier while intimidating applicants away from the job opportunity rather than encouraging their commitment to the process.

Prioritizing User Experience

When designing applications, recruiters should prioritize user experience. Are there any relevant questions to ask that cannot be answered by reviewing the resume? How long should job seekers expect to spend on an application? Many respondents to Bullhorn’s survey also cited poor communication as a reason for dropping their applications, so recruiters should regularly maintain contact with potential recruits throughout the process.

As the U.S. labor shortage has yet to show signs of significant improvement, recruiters are pushed to compete for Gen Z’s attention. Adapting to their expectations will take a concentrated effort, as Gen Z is looking for modern approaches to job applications. Even so, it is more important than ever to cater to the younger employees entering the workforce. Otherwise, recruiters risk wasting resources on outdated recruiting strategies and falling behind competitors who attract employees by prioritizing innovation.

Tackling Racial Bias in Hiring: A Critical DEI Challenge

Marisol Ciovacco

The rise in popularity surrounding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives was an attempt to transform the U.S. workforce into a more inclusive one. In 2024, the effects of DEI are more well-known. Businesses are now aware that when they focus on diversity, they can see benefits such as increased procurement ROI, revenue, and productivity levels. Despite the advantages companies experience from investing in diversity, HR professionals must remain aware that discrimination is still an urgent issue, especially the presence of racial bias in the hiring process.

It’s a fair expectation to think that a rise in DEI initiatives would help the hiring process be more inclusive, and while that may have been a reality for some companies, there is still work to be done. In a paper analyzing 90 studies that included 174,000 job applicants, the researchers found that there has been no major change in hiring discrimination. Another survey from Greenhouse found that 34% of respondents experienced discriminatory interview questions, and 45% of respondents went as far as changing their names on applications to sound “less ethnic.” Unfortunately, those who feel the need to change their names are not unfounded in their reasoning due to the ever-present issue of name-based discrimination. A study performed by economists from the University of California Berkeley and the University of Chicago sought to identify the extent to which discrimination is a systemic problem among companies, using names as a factor in the research. After sending over 80,000 applications to 108 Fortune 500 companies, the economists found that those with “distinctively Black-sounding names” were 10% less likely to receive callbacks overhaul compared to those with “traditionally white-sounding names,” and the likelihood continued to decrease with specific companies.

Name bias isn’t the only way that racial discrimination can manifest during the hiring process. When analyzing job applicants, perceived identity also plays a major role. In 2018, researchers from Texas A&M University sought to determine just how much the presumed racial identity of African American women and Latinas affected their job opportunities in their article “Bias against Latina and African American women job applicants: a field experiment.” The researchers found that cues were being used from applications to form conclusions on the applicant’s racial identity. Applicants perceived as strongly identifying with their racial group received fewer hiring recommendations and a suggested salary that was (on average) $2000 less than those with weakly perceived associations to their racial group. These actions may not be performed consciously, which makes it even more crucial for HR professionals to approach the hiring process with a knowledge of how bias can present itself and negatively impact the way applicants are reviewed.

To properly combat racial bias in the hiring process, HR professionals and recruiters must make this goal a priority. A simple yet powerful first step is to identify that racial bias and discrimination can be present even if it is unconscious. Next, professionals must take the time to learn the different ways that racial discrimination can exist in their own company’s recruitment process. It’s only through identifying the issue that HR professionals can properly find solutions.

The Talent Tightrope: Balancing Act Between Scarcity and Retention

Marisol Ciovacco

In an era where the balance of job supply and demand teeters precariously, the United States sees a staggering 75% of U.S. employers grappling with the daunting challenge of filling open positions. This talent scarcity crisis, accentuated by a confluence of factors including the aftermath of pandemics like COVID-19, the rapid pace of technological change, and societal shifts such as the Great Resignation, demands inventive solutions. As organizations vie for a limited pool of skilled individuals, the need for strategic recruitment, retention, and workplace culture development has never been more critical.

Innovating with Recruitment Strategies

To navigate the complex landscape of talent scarcity, employers are tasked with adopting innovative recruitment strategies. Social media emerges as a potent tool, with nearly 60% of job seekers leveraging these platforms to gauge potential employers, and almost half of Gen Z and Millennials actively pursuing job opportunities they discover on social media. Moreover, employer branding has become fundamental, with three-quarters of job applicants assessing a company’s brand before applying, as highlighted by LinkedIn. Thus, an employer’s ability to leverage social media and craft a compelling employer brand has a significant impact on how an organization navigates talent scarcity.

The Power of Workplace Culture

Additionally, fostering a workplace culture that prioritizes growth, learning, and development is crucial. An SHRM survey reveals a significant gap, with 83% of employees citing career advancement as important, yet only 20% feeling very satisfied with their current employer’s efforts in this area. Addressing these gaps and crafting an environment that meets the aspirations of the workforce is essential for attracting and retaining the scarce talent that is vital for organizational success.

Fostering a supportive workplace culture is not just a strategy but a necessity for tackling talent scarcity and bolstering talent retention effectively. Research from the American Psychological Association reveals that 89% of employees who feel content and aligned with their company’s culture are significantly more inclined to advocate for their employer as an ideal place to work. This advocacy is pivotal, turning employees into ambassadors who attract similar high-caliber talent to the organization. Additionally, companies that are celebrated for their strong, positive cultures witness a remarkable 72% surge in employee engagement levels and a substantial 40% reduction in turnover rates, underscoring the critical role of culture in not only attracting but also retaining the talent necessary for an organization’s success. Cultivating such a culture requires intentional actions and policies that resonate with employees’ values and aspirations, thereby creating an environment where talent thrives and chooses to stay.

Embracing DEI and Reward Systems

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) are not just trends but integral components that define the essence of a modern workplace culture. These elements play a vital role in not only attracting a diverse workforce but also in nurturing an environment where every individual feels valued and understood. A striking 37% of job seekers are hesitant to engage with companies that receive low satisfaction ratings from people of color, showcasing the significant impact of DEI on recruitment. Furthermore, 84% of executives recognize the correlation between insufficient DEI initiatives and high turnover rates, emphasizing the necessity for robust DEI programs. Organizations that proactively engage in DEI efforts are 2.6 times more likely to experience notable enhancements in employee retention, underlining the tangible benefits of a genuinely inclusive culture.

Complementing the foundational importance of DEI, personalized recognition and reward systems emerge as crucial for ensuring employee satisfaction and loyalty, thus playing a significant role in reducing turnover. The lack of recognition is a leading cause for employees to seek opportunities elsewhere. In contrast, organizations that consistently acknowledge and appreciate their employees’ efforts and contributions see a remarkable 31% reduction in voluntary turnover rates, highlighting the power of acknowledgment in retaining talent.

Addressing talent scarcity and enhancing talent retention in today’s complex job market requires a multi-pronged approach. Employers must innovate, leveraging social media and employer branding to attract candidates, while also cultivating a workplace environment that champions DEI, and recognizes individual contributions. By prioritizing growth, learning, and the development of a supportive culture, companies can not only attract but also retain the high-caliber talent essential for organizational success. In essence, the journey toward mitigating talent scarcity and fostering employee loyalty is rooted in building a workplace that values and nurtures its workforce, ensuring that every employee feels valued, heard, and motivated to grow.

The End of Interview Anxiety? Inside John Lewis’s Radical Hiring Revolution

Marisol Ciovacco

Revolutionizing Recruitment at John Lewis

In a bold departure from traditional hiring norms, John Lewis has taken the unprecedented step of publishing its interview questions online, effectively challenging conventional interview practices. This innovative move aims to demystify the interview process and reduce candidate anxiety, potentially revolutionizing how companies approach talent acquisition.

The Psychological Burden of Traditional Interviews

The interview process is an essential, yet often daunting aspect of hiring. Candidates navigate through a maze of emotional and logistical challenges—from perfecting their attire to refining their handshake—all in an effort to make a stellar first impression within the first crucial seven seconds. Such pressure can lead to common missteps: 39% of candidates fail to make a good impression due to not smiling, and 22% of hiring managers cite poor handshakes as a negative factor, contributing to the staggering 93% of job seekers who experience interview-related anxiety.

To combat nerves, many candidates turn to rigorous preparation. A survey by JDP reveals that 70% of respondents rehearse their answers aloud, while 62% prepare anecdotes in advance. Additionally, nearly half plan small talk, and one in four even rehearses jokes to lighten the mood. These preparation strategies underscore the lengths to which candidates go to alleviate stress and perform well.

The Impact of Interview Anxiety on Performance

Unfortunately, the high-stress nature of interviews can sometimes hinder more than help. Research in the International Journal of Selection and Assessment indicates that interview anxiety does not correlate with job performance, suggesting that this anxiety might actually reduce the interview’s effectiveness as a tool for predicting job success.

Given these dynamics, it raises the question: Should hiring processes be so nerve-wracking? With numerous elements of the interview process unnecessarily elevating anxiety and potentially compromising the assessment of a candidate’s true capabilities, it becomes abundantly clear that withholding preparatory materials not only undermines the integrity of the hiring process but also squanders the potential of capable candidates.

This realization seems to underpin John Lewis’s progressive move to provide interview resources, paving the way for more genuine and effective hiring outcomes.

Transforming the Candidate Experience

The practice of providing interview questions in advance can transform stressful interviews into meaningful conversations, as evidenced by the Centre for Digital Public Services. Phillipa Knowles, head of operations, reports that since its inception in 2020, the Centre has improved its recruitment process by sending interview questions to candidates beforehand. This approach has particularly benefited those who are neurodiverse or anxious, enabling them to prepare more effectively.

Neurodiversity and Inclusion in Hiring Practices

Lorna Bullett, a leader on John Lewis’s talent acquisition team, highlights the impact of nerves on neurodivergent candidates, who are more likely to underperform in traditional interview settings compared to less-talented neurotypical candidates. This disparity underscores a broader issue: by failing to adjust interview processes to accommodate neurodivergent individuals, companies risk overlooking highly talented candidates. Research supports this, suggesting that teams including neurodivergent professionals can be 30% more productive than those without.

Furthermore, employees with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) tend to make fewer errors and can be 90 to 140% more productive than their neurotypical counterparts. Despite these advantages, unemployment for neurodivergent individuals remains disproportionately high, with rates as steep as 80%, according to research published in the Harvard Business Review.

John Lewis’s decision to make interview questions publicly accessible is a progressive step towards inclusivity, enhancing the brand’s image by leveling the playing field for all applicants. This move not only reduces the stress associated with interviews but also helps reveal the true potential of talented individuals who might otherwise be hindered by anxiety.

Criticisms and Maintaining the Balance: Spontaneity Versus Preparation

Despite the positive intentions of this decision, it has not been without backlash. Some worry that it leads to canned, polished answers that don’t really show what a candidate can do on the fly. This method might make it harder for interviewers to get a real sense of whether someone’s a good fit, since they’re hearing well-rehearsed responses instead of spontaneous ones. The key is to weigh up the benefits of helping candidates prepare against the need to see how they handle things in the moment, which is crucial for lots of jobs.

That being said, John Lewis states that it will implement a strategy where interviews still include “detailed follow-up questions” and candidates won’t know the specific questions that will be asked, ensuring that elements of spontaneity and adaptability are still tested.

Rethinking Interview Strategies for Modern Hiring

John Lewis’s move to share interview questions in advance is shaking up the usual way we do hiring, aiming to create a fairer playing field for all candidates, especially those who are neurodiverse or might struggle with traditional interview setups. While being open about the interview process can ease candidate stress and lead to more accurate evaluations, it’s important for HR professionals to balance the positives with the possible downsides, tailoring this approach to fit their own company’s needs. As the workplace keeps evolving, we may need to keep experimenting and researching to perfect our hiring methods and really snag the best talent out there. HR leaders should consider all these aspects to craft recruitment strategies that are not only fair but also effective, giving every candidate a fair shot at showing their best.

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Job Interviews: Balancing Efficiency and Humanity

Brianne Loe

Manager greeting candidate at job interview — Mature manager shaking hands with young woman while they sitting at table during job interview

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been rapidly advancing and finding its way into various industries and sectors. One area where its impact is increasingly felt is in the hiring process, specifically in screening resumes. A recent ResumeBuilder survey of HR managers showed that about half of the companies surveyed plan to use AI to run interviews by 2024. While there are potential benefits to using AI in this context, such as increased efficiency and streamlined operations, there are also concerns about the elimination of worthy candidates and the loss of important human factors.

One of the expected benefits of using AI run job interviews is the potential for increased hiring efficiency. With the help of AI-powered algorithms, large companies can automate and standardize their interview processes, saving significant time and resources. AI systems can analyze resumes, conduct preliminary screenings, and even simulate real-time interviews, allowing recruiters to focus on more strategic tasks. This increased efficiency can be particularly valuable for organizations handling a large volume of applicants or seeking to quickly fill positions in highly competitive industries.

Moreover, AI can bring objectivity and fairness to the hiring process by minimizing human biases. Traditional interviews are susceptible to unconscious biases, which can lead to unfair treatment of certain candidates based on their gender, race, or other personal characteristics. AI, on the other hand, can evaluate candidates solely based on their qualifications, skills, and experiences, leveling the playing field and reducing potential discrimination. This holds the promise of a more diverse and inclusive workforce, benefiting both employees and employers.

However, it is crucial to consider the potential downsides of relying solely on AI in job interviews. One significant concern is the possibility of eliminating worthy candidates who do not fit the predetermined patterns or criteria set by the AI algorithms. These algorithms, although sophisticated, are still limited by the data they are trained on and may not always capture the full range of human potential. Exceptional candidates who possess unique qualities, unconventional backgrounds, or hidden talents may be overlooked or unfairly dismissed due to the rigid nature of AI assessments.

Furthermore, AI-driven job interviews would remove the human touch and the important factors that come with it. Human interaction during interviews provides an opportunity for candidates to demonstrate soft skills such as communication, interpersonal abilities, and emotional intelligence. These qualities, often difficult to quantify or assess through algorithms, are crucial in determining a candidate’s cultural fit within an organization. Intuition and gut feelings, which can play a vital role in decision-making, are also absent from AI-driven interviews, potentially leading to suboptimal hiring choices.

Another consideration is the longevity of using AI for job interviews. While AI technology continues to evolve and improve, it is important to question its long-term viability. The job market is dynamic, and the skills and qualities sought by employers are constantly changing. AI algorithms may struggle to keep up with these shifts and accurately evaluate candidates in a rapidly evolving landscape. Human adaptability, judgment, and critical thinking remain invaluable assets in navigating complex situations and assessing candidates’ potential beyond mere qualifications.

While AI can increase hiring efficiency, promote fairness, and minimize biases, there is a real risk of overlooking worthy candidates and disregarding essential human factors in the selection process. The long-term sustainability of relying on AI in job interviews also raises concerns. Striking a balance between efficiency and humanity is crucial, as organizations should consider leveraging AI as a tool to augment and support human decision-making.

A Dip in the Labor Pool

Nate Talley

digital-marketing-team-work-or-happy-business-peo-2023-11-27-05-25-46-utc — Digital marketing, team work or happy business people in meeting planning a group or startup projec.

America’s workforce is changing.

While it’s obvious that economies and labor pools are almost never static in an open market, the changes we are seeing to modern western economies is unprecedented in terms of sheer scale, led on largely due to the availability of affordable global travel and increased international business opportunity.

Culturally, today’s immigrants come from a wider range of countries than those who came through Ellis Island. In 1907, the top five countries of origin for immigrants to the United States were Italy, Russia, Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Ireland. Today, the top five countries of origin are Mexico, China, India, the Philippines, and Vietnam. This diversity of cultures has enriched the American experience.

Economically, today’s immigrant workforce is more skilled than the workforce that came through Ellis Island. In 1907, only 1.3% of immigrants who came to Ellis Island held professional, skilled, or technical occupations. Today, more than 34% of immigrants hold these occupations (Springer). This higher level of education and skills has helped immigrants to find jobs in a wider range of industries, and it has also helped to boost the American economy.

One of the biggest changes sure to affect the US workforce is an aging native populace, and immigration is playing a major role in the national conversation. The US is facing a demographic challenge, and as the Baby Boomer generation retires immigrants are filling the gap. In 2022, immigrants made up 17.4% of the US workforce, and this number is expected to grow in the coming years.

The age distribution of immigrants is also different from that of the native-born population. Immigrants are more likely to be of working age, and they are also more likely to be young. In 2022, 77% of immigrants were of working age (18-64), compared to 59% of the native-born population. And 36% of immigrants were under the age of 35, compared to 23% of the native-born population.

This difference in age distribution is having a significant impact on the US workforce. Immigrants are filling jobs that are left open by retiring Baby Boomers; in some cases they are even helping to boost the economy by starting businesses and creating jobs.

An aging workforce presents two big problems: Labor Shortages and Skill Gaps.

As the Baby Boomer generation retires, there will be a smaller pool of younger workers to replace them. This could lead to labor shortages in some industries, particularly those that are traditionally dominated by older workers, such as healthcare and manufacturing. Labor shortages could make it difficult for businesses to find the workers they need, and this could lead to higher prices for goods and services.

The aging workforce is also facing a skills gap. As older workers retire, they are taking with them their knowledge and skills. This could lead to a shortage of skilled workers in some industries, and it could also make it difficult for businesses to find workers who are able to use new technologies. These skill gaps are also increasingly exacerbated by automation and the use of AI.

A study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine found that immigrants account for about half of the growth in the US labor force since 2000. And a study by the Pew Research Center found that immigrants are more likely to be self-employed than the native-born population.

Another implication is that the workforce is becoming more mobile. Immigrants are more likely to move between states and cities than the native-born population. This mobility helps to keep the interstate economy dynamic and allows businesses to more easily find workers with the skills they need.

The changing age demographics of the US workforce are also having an impact on social programs. For example, the Social Security system is funded by a payroll tax, and the number of workers paying into the system is declining as the Baby Boomer generation retires. Immigrants are helping to offset this decline, as they are more likely to be working age and to pay into the system.

In addition to the economic implications, the changing age demographics of the US workforce are also having a social and cultural impact. The workforce is becoming more diverse, and this diversity is leading to new challenges and opportunities; businesses need to be more mindful of cultural differences in the workplace, and they need to find ways to engender more inclusive environments for all employees.

The educational attainment of the US workforce is also shifting, as more and more workers are obtaining college degrees. In 2020, 37.9% of the population age 25 and older had a bachelor’s degree or higher. This is up from 27.9% in 2000. This shift is being driven by a number of factors, including the rising cost of college, the increasing demand for skilled workers, and the changing demographics of the workforce.

This is leading to a demand for skilled workers, and it is also creating opportunities for businesses that are able to attract and retain these workers. Businesses that are able to hire and train workers with higher levels of education will be better positioned to compete in an ever-changing global economy. They will also be able to attract and retain top talent, which eventually translates to increased productivity.

By all measures America is in a suitable position for future growth, however challenges like automation, decreasing industrial capacity, and illegal labor abuses are a growing concern to many working class families. Those concerns and more in my next edition in this series, coming soon.

12 Page 1 of 2